Cops Lie: The Evidence

COPS LIE

COPS LIE

There is ample evidence showing that police, prosecutors, ICE, and federal law enforcement in the United States lie and mislead in public statements.

For instance, in 2023 Phillip Stinson, a criminal justice professor at Bowling Green University, told USA TODAY that “it's a normal part of policing in some places for police officers to lie." An earlier USA TODAY report looked into disciplinary records of tens of thousands of police officers around the country and found that dishonesty was “a frequent problem.” 

The police press release issued after Minneapolis cops killed George Floyd in May of 2020, titled “Man Dies After Medical Incident During Police Interaction,” is a case in point. The police report referred to Floyd as a “suspect,” accused him of resisting arrest, and cited medical distress — making no mention of what soon came to be well-known fact: that the distress was not drug induced, as they initially claimed, but the result of a cop pressing his knee to Floyd’s neck in broad daylight for nine minutes. Another example is the case of Sonya Massey, killed by police in Illinois in 2024: the initial police report about her death mentioned “shots had been fired” but did not mention that it was police officers who fired the shots. Video footage later revealed that an officer had shot Massey, who was unarmed, at close range in her own kitchen.  

“The press release about George Floyd was not an anomaly,” Jody David Armour, a University of Southern California law professor, told The Guardian. “This is ordinary operating procedures for police departments across the nation.”

A 2021 report from The Guardian uncovered a dozen examples over five years in California alone “of initial police statements misrepresenting events, with major omissions about the officers’ actions, inaccurate narratives about the victims’ behaviors, or blatant falsehoods about decisive factors.” Police blamed individuals' medical conditions for deaths in custody, left out key details that would implicate them, and painted their victims as “criminals” and “perpetrators.”

Since the 2020 Uprisings, many investigations and news reports have uncovered what witnesses and families already knew: that cops lie as a matter of course about incidents they are implicated in. In 2023, the Washington Post covered seven prominent deaths at the hands of police and found that initial police reports were generally misleading, criminalized the person who had been killed, used the passive voice to describe police actions, and sometimes simply fabricated reality to make cops look innocent. The Post concluded that, “In cases where the police are later accused of excessive and unwarranted use of force, the first draft of history is almost always written in part by those same officers, who often portray the police in flattering ways and the alleged suspect in less flattering ones.”

There is no single database of police reports or tracker for police deceptions, and constructing such a resource would be difficult: even the prominent national databases of police killings depend on news reports for verification because neither the states nor the federal government compel police departments to self-report instances of police violence. News reports, especially initially, are often based on police reports, which means the reported cases are generally the ones in which an alternate narrative somehow made it into the news. And as a general principle, it is difficult to know when someone has lied if they get away with it. 

“The press release about George Floyd was not an anomaly. This is ordinary operating procedures for police departments across the nation.”

— Jody David Armour, University of Southern California law professor

The wide availability of smartphone cameras has been revelatory. A 2017 report in Buzzfeed News reviewed 62 instances between 2008 and 2014 where — as in George Floyd’s case — police reports or official testimonies were contradicted by video evidence. The report found that cops were incentivized to lie, generally to cover up wrongdoing in the form of illegal searches or inventing probable cause for an arrest. The report found that instances of police lying were being revealed more often as the presence of video evidence increased. Buzzfeed concluded that “police officers have a long-documented history of lying, a thick catalog of proof even without the help of cameras.”

Cop lies have serious consequences for victims of police violence, protestors who are attacked by police or charged with crimes during demonstrations, and families and communities affected by police lies — most significantly, the deaths continue and survivors of state violence struggle to receive restitution or a renewed sense of safety. While police may update their stories as more facts are revealed, they rarely rescind initial statements or make any attempt to clear the names of their victims. As The Guardian’s Sam Levin writes, “even when journalists correct the record as they continue to report on a case, initial falsehoods can continue to spread online and in some cases be exploited to discredit victims.”

Prosecutors participate in the process, too: In a 1992 survey for the University of Chicago Law Review, Professor Myron Orfield found 90 percent of prosecutors in Chicago reported knowing that police lied in court “at least some of the time.” 

Police unions and associations often put out pro-police propaganda that is not based in evidence, taking a blanket stance of defending officers accused of wrongdoing and releasing statements reinforcing their narratives. They should be reported on as political organizations with an explicit pro-police agenda that frequently involves repeating lies. 

The anecdotal examples are nearly endless, but here are a few:

  • The Chicago Fraternal Order of Police in 2014 defended the killer of 17-year-old Laquan McDonald to the Chicago Tribune; that same organization later used its Facebook page to fundraise for Darren Wilson, Michael Brown’s murderer.

  • Police associations in Milwaukee, Seattle, and New York (among other places) have even organized against their mayors and police chiefs for supporting accountability in cases of police violence. 

Police fraternal organizations also tend to try to distract from the harms caused by their members by downplaying the numbers of people killed by police while highlighting the number of police killed. For instance, the National Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) puts out quarterly press releases about the number of police shot in the line of duty — see, for example, this January 2, 2025 release which reveals the number of officers shot and killed in 2024 was 50. Meanwhile, 2024 was a historic year for police killings of civilians — 1,260 were reported killed by police, the most in a decade

At the beginning of 2021, after a year of protest in response to police killings of Black and Brown people, the FOP put out a release stating that “the only thing that was consistent in 2020 was the ever-changing challenges that law enforcement officers faced” and reasserting its own focus on police deaths rather than on deaths by police. While 47 officers were shot and killed on duty in 2020, according to the Mapping Police Violence project, police officers in the U.S. killed 1,126 people that same year. About one in ten of those people was killed following a traffic stop. 

Police fraternal associations will also frame even the most egregious cases of police violence to suit their members’ interests. In a news release in July 2024, the International Association of Police Chiefs used Sonya Massey’s death at the hands of police in Illinois to call for increased funding to police departments (on the premise that departments need more resources in order to hire and train “good” officers). 

“[Lying] is “something that has been endemic in the history of the American police system for the last three or four generations … And why do they do it? The main reason they do it, historically and now, is they can get away with it.”

— Peter Keane, former San Francisco police commissioner

Cops lie even in the face of direct video evidence contradicting what they say. An initial lie goes a long way, even if the video comes out later.

A 2020 report by CNN reporter Harmeet Kaur found that officers continue to lie in spite of video evidence, because:

a) they aren’t held accountable;

b) investigations are biased in their favor;

c) when they are disciplined, it is minimal; and

d) they’re protected from repercussions by department policies and union contracts.

As former San Francisco police commissioner Peter Keane told Buzzfeed, lying is “something that has been endemic in the history of the American police system for the last three or four generations … And why do they do it? The main reason they do it, historically and now, is they can get away with it.”

Return to How to Clean Up Copaganda

Click here